Web Pages That Suck - learn good web design by looking at bad web design

 

Worst Websites of the Year

Worst Websites of the Year: 2012-2005

bad websites are like sinking shipsWorst Websites
of 2012

Worst Websites of 2011

Worst Websites of 2010

Worst Websites of 2009

Worst Websites of 2008

Worst Websites of 2007

Worst Websites of 2006

Worst Websites of 2005


Daily Dose of Bad Design (Daily Sucker)

Current Examples of Bad Web Design Presented Daily (direct link)

Bad Web Design

Overview (direct link)


Good Web Design


Web Design Checklists


Subscriptions

opens in new window
My Google + Page

subscribe to my rss feed
Subscribe to RSS feed

Follow me on Twitter
Follow me on Twitter

Articles


Everything Else

The Daily Sucker - Current examples of bad web design

The Daily Sucker

Sites featured in articles like Worst Websites of 2010 often are redesigned, which explains why some sites mentioned in my articles don't match their current look. The Daily Sucker features current examples of bad web design which haven't been fixed (yet).

If you see a site that you think sucks, email the URL to me. No personal pages (personal pages are supposed to reflect the individual's personality and artistic freedom) or web site designers (it would look like a conflict of interest), or others of their ilk.

If I think there's some merit to your selection, I may post it along with some commentary. If you know of a site that qualifies, let me know.

FedEx – Example #1 of Bad Web Design for November 2, 2011

November 2nd, 2011 5:05 am by Vincent Flanders

this site is badly designed

Submitter’s comments: I can’t read it very well.

Vincent Flanders’ comments: For those of you who don’t understand the concept of contrast, my Daily Sucker from 9-9-9 explains it quite well.

Even though the line height on FedEx’s home page keeps the text separated, it requires effort to read the page. Visitors shouldn’t have to strain to read your text. FedEx uses #666– Satan’s CSS — throughout their site. I’ve met a few of their web employees and they’re too smart for this.

EedEx

Posted in Daily Sucker, Usability, Web Design |


Comments (2)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Login or signup now to comment.
kingsnake's avatar

kingsnake · 700 weeks ago

The #666666 on #ffffff text meets the HP standards (400/125), and is not far below the W3C standards (500/125), for color contrast at 459/153, per the Colour Contrast Analyser. The purple on white is 528/205; purple on grey 433/172. Problem is, the text is tiny. Given that most of the people shipping via Fedex will be older than 18, that's a problem. Site is mostly not gooped up with eye candy and wing dings. (Except for the pointless flash banner -- I'm already there to ship, no need to market me on shipping with you!)
Reply
Short runs of 666 are okay, but paragraphs get tedious. I give FedEx a pass on this one. (TechCrunch no, tho)
Reply

Comments by