Daily Sucker - Current examples of bad web design from Web Pages That Suck - Learn good web design by looking at bad web design

The Daily Sucker

Sites featured in articles like Worst Websites of 2010 often are redesigned, which explains why some sites mentioned in my articles don't match their current look. The Daily Sucker features current examples of bad web design which haven't been fixed (yet).

If you see a site that you think sucks, email the URL to me. No personal pages (personal pages are supposed to reflect the individual's personality and artistic freedom) or web site designers (it would look like a conflict of interest), or others of their ilk.

If I think there's some merit to your selection, I may post it along with some commentary. If you know of a site that qualifies, let me know.

self-opinionated antichrist digital pigswill…

October 23rd, 2012 4:04 am by Vincent Flanders

One of the candidates for Worst Website of 2012 (who shall remain anonymous) wasn’t thrilled at being included and suggested WebPagesThatSuck as a candidate for the Daily Sucker. The e-mail said my site qualified because:

Inaccurate content.

Garbage layout.

Boring.

Follows the “same old – same old” trendy sheep sites.

Has NOTHING of any interest in its rubbish pages.

Is self-opinionated antichrist digital pigswill…

It seems like somebody else suggested that I was the FBI’s “conduit for absurd and irrelevant attacks.” I’ll have to add that to the above comments.

Proud to be America’s Website.

Posted in Not a Daily Sucker |

Comments (11)

Logging you in...

Dashboard | Edit profile | Logout

Logged in as

0 Vote up Vote down

Sav · 648 weeks ago

I beg to differ... For all the points

Report

+1 Vote up Vote down

kingsnake · 648 weeks ago

We should all aspire to be "self-opinionated antichrist digital pigswill"! :-)

Report

+2 Vote up Vote down

Kit 80p · 648 weeks ago

Ooooh; got someone a tad upset did we? We all know that WPTS sucks; that's the point, and it's intentional.
Still, everyone is entitled to an opinion; time will tell who is right.

Report

+1 Vote up Vote down

Dave J. 72p · 648 weeks ago

Arrogance like that is what keeps crappy websites up and running. That goes for Vincent, and the guy who complained to him! Vincent's arrogance, at least, is founded and respected.

Report

0 Vote up Vote down

RFW · 648 weeks ago

Cripey, Vince! You should start peddling t-shirts saying "Self-opinionated Antichrist Digital Pigswill…read all about it at WebPagesThatSuck.com". Might create a torrent of new readers of WPTS.

I'll take one, please, size xxl, black or some dark color.

Report

0 Vote up Vote down

CW Cyrix · 648 weeks ago

This reminds me of the time I looked back on some older Daily Sucker entries a month ago... Apparently some viewers Googled the site, found out it was a Daily Sucker and expressed their opinions. xD

The link: http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com/dailysucker/2012/...

Not nearly as bad: http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com/dailysucker/2011/...

Report

0 Vote up Vote down

Heather · 647 weeks ago

You should add, "Never puts up the websites that I submit because he is a big Stinky Head!" :)

Report

+1 Vote up Vote down

blogc2011 83p · 621 weeks ago

Interesting post and thanks for sharing. Some things in here I have not thought about before.Thanks for making such a cool post which is really very well written.will be referring a lot of friends about this.Keep blogging stage pilotage

Report

+1 Vote up Vote down

Stave123 76p · 621 weeks ago

It seems like somebody else suggested that I was the FBI’s “conduit for absurd and irrelevant attacks.” I’ll have to add that to the above comments. émotions du ventre

Report