Chef in a box – An Example of Bad Web Design for April 18, 2013
April 17th, 2013 9:09 pm by Vincent Flanders
Submitter’s comments: I found this website from an ad in a website that is about genuine food. I trusted the ad, thinking the website must be good if it’s on this type of website.
However, upon seeing the site I see only: “click to read.” Then I see lots of buttons, making me feel that using the website is complicated.
Then I actually read the content. The content does not suck.
Apparently, the website is done is a format which is used in newspapers that you can read on the Internet and catalogs for websites that sell stuff.
The website is unusual in that it has no content except for the “click to read” part. Usually, you can read the content immediately.
Did I mention the website’s content uses words that I don’t know what they mean—even if Swedish is one of my two native languages?
The website uses a mechanism where the website can be scrolled up and down and to the sides, which I don’t know if that exists on other websites.
Vincent Flanders’ comments: What’s wrong with this site can be summed up in three words: “Flash. Flash. Flash.” Geez.
Posted in Daily Sucker, Usability, Web Design, Worst Web Sites |