February 11th, 2015 3:03 am by Vincent Flanders
Submitter’s comments: I’ve got a real sucker for you here. Velokraft is a European manufacturer of very beautiful, very expensive, carbon fiber recumbent bicycles. I think they’re German but I really don’t know because their Facebook page tells you very little and their website is unfathomable. This is a stage beyond Mystery Meat Navigation: it’s Mystery Mystery Navigation. There are links which display the front page in English, German, Spanish and Polish and two further links for the sites creators. Beyond that I can find no way to get into the site proper.
I know there is more because Bing can see it and take me there. I wondered if AdBlockPlus was responsible for me not finding a link, but even after it’s disabled I still can’t get in. Oh, and I’ve tried on three different browsers including the venerable Opera 12. If you can find the secret of the missing link I’d love to know it.
Vincent Flanders’ comments: I wish I knew the secret of the missing link. I don’t. When I went to the home page, my web of trust plugin said the site rated “Poor” on Trustworthiness and “Unsatisfactory” on Child Safety. I say it’s BS and a waste of HTML code. While it’s bad, it’s not so bad that it “would make Jesus want to drink gin straight out of the cat dish.” It’s bad enough to be the Daily Sucker.
Velokraft
Posted in Daily Sucker, Usability, Web Design, Worst Web Sites |
February 10th, 2015 12:12 am by Vincent Flanders
Submitter’s comments: Ownerterms.com is part of a ring of real estate web sites, all with similar designs and all with the same problems. The main page is too wide for my Macbook’s 1280×800 screen. Add the garish colors and oversized text, and you have a mess. Oh, and don’t get me started on the messy, outdated code.
Vincent Flanders’ comments: Obviously, if it doesn’t fit in our submitter’s 1280×800 screen, it isn’t going to fit in my 1200×1700 screen. The good news is you can read the text. The bad news is a couple of weeks ago, Google sent out emails to websites that weren’t mobile friendly and on their PageSpeed insights page they said this page “…may not pass Google’s Mobile-Friendly Test. Oh, the home page’s mobile score was 44/100 and the desktop score was 67/100. See the screenshot below for how the page shows up on mobile devices.Click the image to see the site as Google sees it.
I’m going to give you a warning you need to heed: If you don’t fix your websites to be mobile friendly in 2015, Google will come down HARD on your site’s search engine rankings.
Owner Terms
Posted in Daily Sucker, Usability, Web Design, Worst Web Sites |
December 10th, 2014 10:10 pm by Vincent Flanders
Submitters’ comments: Let’s get it all on the front page, shall we? Despite using the Microsoft program to make the page, why put so much on the cover page? Even James Joyce had an editor and this site needs to be sliced, diced, and organized into usable bits.
Vincent Flanders’ comments: There are also a lot of the usual type issues: mutli-colored, inconsistent use of color on text (H1 and H2 tags with same color), justified and flush-left text, etc.
On Camera
Posted in Daily Sucker, Usability, Web Design, Worst Web Sites |
December 9th, 2014 5:05 pm by Vincent Flanders
Submitters’ comments: Here you go…
Vincent Flanders’ comments: This website is where badly created, cheesy animated GIFs go to die.
This website is part of what I can “Cliche Web Design” or “1997 Web Design.” It would like to be a classic example of Mistake #6 from Biggest Mistakes in Web Design 1995-2015 — “Have you ever seen another web site? Really? Doesn’t look like it.“ Actually, I should have said, “Have you ever seen a hotel website before?
This may be the worst looking hotel website on the internet. I’ll leave it to you to try and find one worse.
Exmouth View Hotel
Posted in Daily Sucker, Usability, Web Design, Worst Web Sites |
November 13th, 2014 9:09 pm by Vincent Flanders
Submitters’ comments:
It’s terrible. It’s hard to read. The color scheme looks like and makes you want to vomit. I understand the outdoors is “green,” but for God’s sakes man.
Vincent Flanders’ comments: The contrast—or lack of—is just wrong, wrong, wrong I especially like the centered, left-centered, and right-centered text within only three paragraphs!
The site is a classic example of Mistake #6 from Biggest Mistakes in Web Design 1995-2015 — “Have you ever seen another web site? Really? Doesn’t look like it.“ I call this type of design the “I haven’t taken my anti-psychotics in a while school of web design.”
Swift Nature Camp
Posted in Daily Sucker, Usability, Web Design, Worst Web Sites |